A Learning Experience Essay Essays

A Learning Experience Essay Essays A Learning Experience Essay Essay A Learning Experience Essay Essay In this content. there will be a treatment on how person can larn how to non utilize drugs and what it was like for them before and after their initial usage. There will be an designation of what person would larn from utilizing to non utilizing. Besides included in the treatment there will be a description of how someone’s acquisition could hold occurred through classical conditioning. placing the innate stimulation. the innate response. the learned stimulation. and the conditioned response. An account will be given in respects to how their acquisition could hold occurred through operant conditioning. depicting the behaviour. effect. and support. There will be an reference of how the acquisition could hold occurred through cognitive-social acquisition. Identifying the Learning Experience Let us state that person has been making drugs on a societal footing. populating a wild and unworried life style. Until one twenty-four hours. a different manner of utilizing the drug becomes introduced. In that case the drug is introduced. it becomes an automatic dependence. It becomes an overpowering desire to hold more to obtain that haste repeatedly. It is the loss of all control and the beginning of losing the power of life. The individual frits at the idea of the drug and loses control when they can non acquire a clasp of it when they want it and how they want it. It becomes a portion of their life style and it becomes more hard for them to lose the desire after a long period of utilizing. It takes a power greater so themselves to discontinue and the aid of people like them who have been clean. With the aid and support of these people. the desire to utilize becomes less and less and the â€Å"disease of dependence. † becomes arrested. What is Learned through the Experience The long term larning experience is larning to populate without the usage of drugs. Populating with the usage of drugs causes many to populate a life of unmanageability. It leads to a clip in an addict’s life when they seek a topographic point where they can have aid. hence taking to a clean life. They no longer want to populate with the compulsion of utilizing and no longer with a life of insanity. Classical Conditioning. Unconditioned Stimulus and Response. Conditioned Stimulus and Response Classical conditioning is a signifier of acquisition in which a impersonal stimulation becomes a conditional stimulation capable of arousing a given response after being repeatedly presented with an innate ( important ) stimulation ( Oxford Reference. 2007 ) . For illustration. an nut may utilize a pipe. cigarillos. turn over up documents. or panpipes ( conditional stimulation ) whenever an nut set out to utilize their preferable drug of pick. Finally. the addict becomes craved at the presence of these points ( conditional response ) . even when the drug was absent ( unconditioned stimulation ) . Therefore. the absence of the drug leads to the overpowering desire to utilize ( unconditioned response ) . If the drugs and all the points are present and so something runs out. the conditional and unconditioned stimulation occurs together and are presented at the same topographic point. doing the nut powerless. Operant Conditioning. Behavior. Consequence. Reinforcement Operant conditioning ( instrumental conditioning ) is a signifier of larning where an person forms an association between a peculiar behavioural response and a peculiar support ( Oxford Reference. 2007 ) . In the instance of an nut. when an nut takes the first drug it may be pleasant. but so a 1000 is neer plenty. Therefore. the platitude becomes an addict’s worst incubus. They use to populate and populate to utilize. ensuing in the disease of dependence. Once an nut realizes the more they use the more unpleasant it gets. they do non desire to confront the effects of gaols. establishments. or decease. Therefore. they seek the aid of retrieving nuts. admit their impotence over the drug. and do a pick to come clean. As an nut efforts to come clean. they need the support of Narcotics Anonymous meetings on a day-to-day footing. It is recommended that a newcomer attend 90 meetings in 90 yearss. associate themselves with other retrieving nuts of the same sex. and to seek out a patron to work the Twelve Steps. With all these options that Narcotics Anonymous provides helps a retrieving nut get good on their manner to populating a clean productive life. The retrieving nut demands to be invariably reminded to take it a twenty-four hours at a clip. retrieve that they didn’t go an nut over dark. to maintain traveling back ( to meetings ) . and easy does it. If an addict supports coming back. they are less likely to travel out an backsliding ; but if they keep crushing themselves up. make non alter the people. topographic points. and things around them. and go on to maintain their old behaviours. they are merely penalizing themselves doing it less likely for them to return to meetings and alternatively travel out and usage. Cognitive-Social Learning Cognitive-social acquisition incorporates the general constructs of conditioning. but instead than trusting on a simple stimulation and response theoretical account. this theory emphasizes the reading or thought that occurs within the being. stimulus-organism-response ( Carpenter-Huffman. 2010 ) . In the instance of an nut. nuts have attitudes. beliefs. outlooks. motives. and emotions that affect larning ( Carpenter-Huffman. 2010 ) . In the instance of a retrieving nut. these old beliefs. attitudes. false motive and outlooks. and lost emotions. being in the suites of a Narcotics Anonymous meeting helps them to socialise with other retrieving nuts and shortly the fledgling is able to larn new behaviours through the observations. suggestions. and reading of literature given. In a traffic circle manner. the fledgling begins by copying and sharing in meetings. additions a comfort. develops a sense of security. and becomes honest with themselves. leting them to go honest with other retrieving nuts. They learn that non one individual is different from another in a Narcotics Anonymous meeting. but they are all likewise. one nut making out to assist another nut recover. Decision With the continued socialisation and fellowshipping of Narcotics Anonymous. a retrieving nut can lose the changeless desire to utilize. happen a power greater than themselves. and live a new life taking it a twenty-four hours at a clip because any twenty-four hours clean is a twenty-four hours of success. Classical conditioning is a erudite behaviour that happens with or without the drugs being present. Operant conditioning is cognizing that there are effects for this learned ehavior ( drug usage ) . that consequences in penalty ( an nut seeking to retrieve but still holding the presence of their old people. topographic points and things ensuing in backsliding ) . and lead to a desire to hold positive support ( an nut come ining into recovery after a life of licking ) . Cognitive-social acquisition is coming to the realisation that through engagement in the Narcotics Anonymous plan. it becomes easier to retrieve seeing that other nuts excessively have chosen to retrieve ( copying and practising the rules. traditions. and finishing the 12 stairss ) .

Secret Service Protection For Presidential Candidates

Secret Service Protection For Presidential Candidates Most presidential candidates are entitled to receive Secret Service protection from the federal law enforcement agency that also provides security to all U.S. presidents and vice presidents and their families. Serious presidential candidates begin receiving Secret Service protection during the primary campaigns and continue to get coverage through the fall election if they become the nominee. Secret service protection for presidential candidates is provided for in federal law. Here are answers to some of the most commonly asked questions about Secret Service protection for candidates. Which Presidential Candidates Get Secret Service Protection The Secret Service protects only major presidential candidates and only those who request coverage. The secretary of Homeland Security determines which presidential candidates are considered major after consultation with an advisory committee, according to the agency. Major presidential candidates can decline Secret Service Protection. WhoDecides Which Candidates Get Secret Service Protection The Homeland Security director makes his determination on which candidates get Secret Service protection in consultation with an advisory panel that includes the speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives; the House minority whip; the Senate majority and minority leaders; and an additional member chosen by the committee itself. Criteria for Providing Secret Service Protection Major candidates are those that have considerable prominence among the public and have raised substantial money for their presidential campaigns. Specifically, primary candidates become eligible for Secret Service protection, according to the Congressional Research Service, if they: Are publicly declared candidates.Are actively campaigning nationally and are contesting at least 10 state primaries.Are pursuing the nomination of a qualified party, one whose presidential candidate received at least 10 percent of the popular vote in the prior election.Are qualified for public matching funds of at least $100,000, and have raised at least $10 million in additional contributions.Have received by April 1 of the election year an average of 5 percent in individual candidate preferences in the most recent national opinion polls by ABC, CBS, NBC, and CNN, or have received at least 10 percent of the votes cast for all candidates in two same-day or consecutive primaries or caucuses. WhenPresidential Candidates Get Secret Service Protection Presidential and vice presidential nominees and their spouses are to receive Secret Service protection within 120 days of a general presidential election. In modern history, however, major candidates receive Secret Service protection well before that time, usually early in the primary campaigns in the late winter and early spring. Not every presidential candidate wants Secret Service protection, though. Ron Paul, 2012 Republican presidential hopeful popular among libertarians, declined Secret Service protection. The Texas congressman described Secret Service protection as a form of welfare. You know, you’re having the taxpayers pay to take care of somebody. I’m an ordinary citizen. I would think I should pay for my own protection. And it costs, I think, more than $50,000 a day to protect those individuals. That’s a lot of money, Paul said. Cost of Secret Service Protection The cost of providing Secret Service protection to presidential candidates exceeds $200 million. The costs have risen dramatically as the field of candidates has grown larger. The cost of providing Secret Service protection for candidates in the 2000 election was about $54 million. It rose to $74 million in 2004, $112 million in 2008, $125 million in 2012 and about $204 million in 2016.   Secret Service protection costs taxpayers about $38,000 a day per candidate, according to published reports. Secret Service Protection History Congress passed a law authorizing Secret Service protection for presidential candidates for the first time following the 1968 assassination of U.S. Sen. Robert Kennedy, who was seeking the Democratic presidential nomination.